Last
week the governor of the 10th most populous state in the union suggested
that congressional elections should be suspended here. Why would the chief magistrate of the State
of North Carolina call for the abrogation of the first clause in the second
section of Article I of the United States Constitution, which requires that the
House of Representatives to be “chosen every second Year by the
People of the several States”?
Well, who knows what she
was actually thinking, but here is what she actually said: "I think
we ought to suspend, perhaps, elections for Congress for two years and just
tell them we won't hold it against them, whatever decisions they make, to just
let them help this country recover. I really hope that someone can agree with
me on that." In other words, the Governor does not want our
elected representatives troubled by the will of the people as they rule over us
in our best interests during hard times.
Later she said she was just joshing, which I guess I am willing to
accept. But I keep reading that sentence
trying to find the joke in there and I can’t.
I guess you could say she was being ironic, as in isn’t
it ironic that our chief elected state executive would advocate the abandonment
of the foundational principles of federalism and representative government upon
which the entirety of American Democracy is premised? But if this is irony, it is not the biting Jonathan
Swift Modest Proposal kind,
it is the Alanis Morissette Black Fly In
Your Chardonnay variety that represents the sloppy emotionality of our
current governing class. When the going gets tough, which it now
surely is, their answer is not to more firmly embrace the principles of liberal
democracy that set and have kept us free for over two centuries, but to casually
kick them to the curb. “Ahh, Elections-Smelections, who needs them? Just do whatever you need to do up there to
save us. We won’t hold it against you if
you screw up by voting you out or anything.”
I suppose you have to give the Governor points for
boldness. It would be one thing if she had
picked some obscure corner of the Constitution to tear off and wrap around her
chewing gum, as in “what’s the big deal about Bills of Attainder. Let’s go ahead and have some of those. I really hope that someone can agree with me
on that.” She might have slid that
one by us pretty easily. But suspending
elections? Wasn’t that the whole point
of the American Revolution in the first place—an extended and bloody objection
to being ruled from afar by an unelected and unaccountable master regardless of
how exigent the circumstances? The
Governor must really think we are asleep at the switch here in the Tar Heel
Stat, so she went big.
But I think she overestimated our somnambulance. We know that two hundred years is a blink of
an eye in the vast history of man’s temptation to tyrannize his fellows. The fact that America has remained a free and
stable democracy even that long is not a given or a lucky accident. It is the result of our brilliant
Constitution and the will to defend it from political hackery, both evil and
well-meaning. If you are a soldier or a
lawyer you have taken a sacred oath to continue that defense until death. But no American needs an oath to recognize this
as an obligation of citizenship in a free society.
It’s some sweet wine of liberty we’ve been drinking from sea to
shining sea. But it takes constant
vigilance to keep straining out that Black Fly of Tyranny that periodically goes kerplop in
the Chardonnay when would-be tyrants think we're a bit tipsy. Thank
you Governor Perdue for reminding us of that.
David,
ReplyDeleteCome on … Gov. Perdue was obviously using hyperbole to highlight what we can all agree is a serious problem: Washington politicians who focus on their own election instead of what’s best for the people they serve.
Ummm . . . maybe. I hope you're right. I listened to her speech and it didn't sound that way. But if that is what she says, I'll believe it. I really want to believe it because the other is horrible.
ReplyDeleteBut, here is what I don't understand about that theory. Why is bad for the country for our politicians to be accountable to us by worrying about their re-election? Isn't that the whole point of democratic self-rule?